NDA Review – Instant Non-Disclosure Agreement Risk Check

Upload your NDA (unilateral or mutual) and get a clear, actionable risk assessment in minutes—plus suggested wording to fix red flags.

What We Check

We analyse the clauses that most often create risk or disputes in NDAs:

Definition of "Confidential Information"

Scope, oral disclosures, marking requirements, "need-to-know" access controls and boundaries.

Exclusions

Prior knowledge, public domain, independently developed, third-party rights.

Purpose Limitation & Use

Permitted use tied to a specific project/transaction; no reverse engineering.

Term & Survival

Confidentiality period vs. trade secret protection; survival of obligations.

Residuals

“Memory clause” carve-outs that allow use of unretained know-how.

Return/Destruction

Procedures, certificates of destruction, back-ups, legal holds.

Common Red Flags

And why they matter for your business

⚠️ High Risk Issues

Vague "Confidential Information"

Includes anything “related to” the discloser → creates accidental breaches.

No workable Exclusions

Blocks use of info you already had or develop independently.

Unlimited Term

For ordinary confidential info (not trade secrets) → hard to police, can be unreasonable.

Hidden non-compete/non-solicit

Converts a simple NDA into a restrictive covenant.

✅ What We Look For

Clear, specific definitions

Confidential information is precisely defined with reasonable scope.

Balanced exclusions

Protects both parties’ pre-existing knowledge and independent development.

Reasonable term limits

2-5 years for ordinary info, unlimited only for true trade secrets.

UK-friendly terms

English law and London jurisdiction for practical enforcement.

How It Works

Get your NDA analysis in under 60 seconds

1

Upload

Upload your NDA (PDF or DOCX)

2

AI Analysis

Clause-by-clause checks against best-practice patterns

3

Report

Red/Amber/Green risks + plain-English fixes

4

Export

PDF/DOCX export or share link with counterparties

Average time to first result: 20–60 seconds

Sample NDA Review

Mutual NDA – Vendor due diligence
Amber – Safe with Edits

Key Findings

Definition: Overly broad; adds "related to" catch-all
Exclusions: Present but missing independent development
Residuals: Allowed without restrictions
Term: 5 years, survival for trade secrets unlimited
Non-Solicit: 24 months embedded
Governing Law: England & Wales; jurisdiction London

Suggested Wording

Add: "Confidential Information excludes information independently developed without use of the Discloser's CI."

Restrict residuals: "Residuals shall not include source code, algorithms, or business plans and confer no license."

Move non-solicit to the main commercial agreement or narrow to 12 months and named personnel.

Disclaimer: Automated review aids negotiation; it is not legal advice.

NDA Best Practices

For UK Startups

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a mutual NDA better than one-way?

If both sides disclose, mutual is simpler and fairer. Use one-way where only one party shares.

2–5 years for ordinary confidential info; trade secrets can be indefinite.

Only with strong limits (no source code/algorithms/customer lists) and no implied license.

Yes—e-signatures are broadly recognised in the UK when execution formalities are met.

No. It accelerates review and negotiation; get legal advice for edge cases or high-value deals.

Ready to review your NDA?

Upload your document and get instant analysis

Drop your contract here
or click to browse files